Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '<' in /opt/bitnami/apache2/htdocs/forums/archive/global.php(117) : eval()'d code on line 1
Edelbrock intake vs Trickflow intake [Archive] - StangBangerz Forums

PDA

View Full Version : Edelbrock intake vs Trickflow intake



Steves LX
04-20-2008, 10:43 PM
What intake flows better on both bottom end and top end Edelbrock 5.0 performer or Trick Flow Street Heat?

12seclx
04-21-2008, 02:47 AM
What intake flows better on both bottom end and top end Edelbrock 5.0 performer or Trick Flow Street Heat?

Well... my Mountaineer $150 intake seems to be doing just fine and dandy, propelling my ride to 12.0's.... :tongue2:

A friend of mine had regular gt-40's w/ an Anderson N-41 cam, and Edelbrock RPM II intake.... Ran 12.30 @ 110mph.... 3.73 gears, 1 5/8 bbk longtubes, stock computer-no chip. He used to have a Trick Flow Track Heat and I preached to him for about 3 months. When he switched to the RPM II, he couldn't believe the difference and apologized for not listening to me earlier... :bigthumb

So, I don't vote for either intake. I vote for the RPMII Edelbrock!

NXcoupe
04-21-2008, 09:45 AM
Out of the two you suggested, I would go with the trick flow depending on the heads you are using. The rpm II is a much better intake than the tfs track heat, again depending on heads and combo, but not as much of a factor.
The knock off copies of the performer aren't as good a the real thing, keep that in mind too.