is this a gould stang??

[dawsin94cobra]

http://cincinnati.craigslist.org/ctd/2397409072.html

[Stangman]

Sweet... according to the description it has both a 2.3 4 cylinder AND the 5.0 H.O. V8!! lmao!!

[Pitbull1052]

Sweet... according to the description it has both a 2.3 4 cylinder AND the 5.0 H.O. V8!! lmao!!




That means it's a 7.3l V-12 right??? lol

[dawsin94cobra]

That means it's a 7.3l V-12 right??? lol

so its a diesil v12.... sounds normal lol

[setty2706]

When i first saw the ad a few months ago .... The gould though came into my head as well.. I dont believe it is. My buddy back in high school had the similar paint styling and wasnt a gould ....


but i could be wrong :dork:

[Goober]

Draggin50 would be the one to ask, but my money is also on "no".

[gouldstang]

nope.. not one of my jobs...

[dawsin94cobra]

nope.. not one of my jobs...

just thought it kinda looked like one!!

[Applejaxx95vert]

not enough paint work under the hood.

[draggin50]

Similar type of scheme I guess.... Sounds like they need to edit their add to match the actual car.

[thecollector]

I also don't remember 2.73 traction loks but could be wrong. Clean car but don't see it going @ that price.

[chris91]

I remember this car popping up on here before. If I recall correctly someone on here painted it.

[sean]

I have had that car offered to me as a trade for 4 different things I had. It was on c/l for @ 4000. That lot is down the street from me. Ugly car at a stupid place. The owner is a bit different. Indian guy. Nice gut... just a bit odd.

[skeptiq]

I have seen it on cl for the past few months at least.

[Stangman]

I also don't remember 2.73 traction loks but could be wrong. Clean car but don't see it going @ that price.

My old '89 GT had factory 2.73's w/ a trac lok, but had 4.10's when I had it. I decoded the door tag.