I agree again, but whining on a car site does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to change it !!!
Printable View
I agree again, but whining on a car site does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to change it !!!
Does TO.
LOL.
DOES NOT !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by facemelter71
:lol:
Wrong about what that all cops are not good people, that having camera is the only proof. That you are ignorant to this? The facts are ALL COPS ARE NOT GOOD PEOPLE A GOOD PERCENTAGE OF THEM ARE KIDS WHO GOT PICKED ON IN SCHOOL AND HATE THE WORLD. I expect to be treated as innocent until proven guilty, you may accept it that if a cop says it it must be true however the only man I take his word to be undisputable is Jesus.Quote:
Originally Posted by k062693w
I admit you are wrong.
Alan
Show me where I said all cops were good ??? Go ahead look for it !!!:bigthumbQuote:
Originally Posted by Dirtyd0g
I said that there are good and bad people in ALL lines of work ... Big difference there ... Now who is the Ignorant one that apparently can't read ??? :rolleyes:
And since you have said it more then once, I'm going to say that YOU were one of those kids that got picked on and bullied in school !!! :lol:
Now don't you need to get back on those CBs ??? :bigthumb
Or they was bullies and want to continue!:flipoff:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtyd0g
But they are not using fixed point timing.Quote:
Originally Posted by k062693w
So we both said the same thing yet you continue to argue...what exactly are you arguing? You agree with the law, cops should have the utmost authority, Whats next you gonna say guns kill people too? Or just make stupid statements that make you look like a complete and total moron. Did you forget to take your meds today or something?Quote:
Originally Posted by k062693w
Alan
I don't recall seeing this up for a public vote :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by k062693w
DOES TOQuote:
Originally Posted by k062693w
INFINITY.haha.
its the police
:lol: LMFAO Pot meet Kettle !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtyd0g
Thank You for proving my "OPINION" of you from post #27 !!!
Oh I forgot that you have reading comprehension problems ;) Here I'll refresh your memory !!!
I left out the other parts to make it easier for you to understand, Or do I need to type slower so you can keep up ??? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by k062693w
And BTW I take my "MEDS" like clockwork, But thanks for the concern !!! :bigthumb
DAMN YOU !!! You went and pulled the infinity card on me !!! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by facemelter71
Sorry I have a Cub Scout leaders meeting to go to, But I'll be back later to play !!! :lol:
I said you were ignorant to the subject, because my point was the only way to prove innocence now is havign a camera. You had to prove you were ignorant all around. It wasn't an opinion of you at that point. I'm done giving you what you want. Fortunately your opinion of me means absolutely nothing. You just want to argue and stir crap. This law is stupid, the same as seatbelt laws, helmet laws and abotu 100 other laws that are intended for no purpose but to control the masses. Maybe you like being told what to do. I prefer to think for myself.
Alan
Right back at you buddy !!! You are too easy to mess with I'll leave you alone before you start crying again !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtyd0g
Again thanks for proving my "OPINION" and playing !!! LMAO
BTW No reply necessary !!! LOL
OTR truckers already have these.Quote:
Originally Posted by 85_SS_302_Coupe
It is ok you have convinced us you don't have a clue what you are talking about. Good job on making it personal. This is why politics are trouble.Quote:
Originally Posted by k062693w
I think it is sad that we need navigational systems or cameras to prove we are innocent in a society that claims innocent until proven guilty. You won't catch me crying about anything that happens on the internet, the only thing I care that much about is my family and close friends.
Alan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtyd0g
It's even better that you have proved that you have even less of a clue as I do !!!
Again NO MORE REPLYS NEEDED TO PROVE MY POINT !!!
Or do you just have to have the last word to "TRY" and act like you have a clue ???
What was your point????
This thread is hilarious!!!!
Just FYI, so you guys can relax a little bit. There is a lot more to it than "he appeared to be speeding." Any defense attorney who has half a brain (or private citizen for that matter) can argue a speeding ticket and win if the officer does not truly know what he/she is doing. I, for one, cannot estimate speed without the use of speed measuring devices. Therefore, I don't do it. There was a time in my career, many years ago, when I was really good with the radar and could estimate speed by the tone given. After spending several years doing desk work, I can no longer claim that experience at trial. Therefore, I rely solely on the technology of speed measuring devices. Most State Troopers are highly trained in speed measurement and they have a plethora of methods to use. I think most still rely on speed measuring devices when monitoring traffic.
My advice is this:
If an officer stops you and indicates that he used personal estimation void of any speed measuring device to ascertain that you were speeding, POLITELY engage him in conversation about how exactly one does that. He may or may not choose to explain it to you. You should, however, get a pretty good idea from his response alone whether or not he is full of crap! Personally, I doubt that many of you will ever have this happen.
On a side note, I post this only to offer a little perspective. I will not engage in debate over sily ideas or the hatred for law enforcement. As Aaron has so aptly stated, there are good and bad in all things. I have personally witnessed what I considered to be deplorable behavior by police. Those officers, however, are in the minority.
WOW, I want to hear how loud you all cry, about that idea!Quote:
Originally Posted by 85_SS_302_Coupe