wahhhhhh!!! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Metcalf Racing
Printable View
wahhhhhh!!! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Metcalf Racing
WOW!:dummy:Quote:
Originally Posted by yougotjunk
Just want to clarify what are the rules for 2009 Dirty Dozen?
Should have Rules and Dates for the Running of the Dozen before the end of the month.:bigthumbQuote:
Originally Posted by outlaw85
All I know is...I'm going to pound everyone on the "other dozen"
You will sell your heap by then.:eek::lol:
oh yeah lolQuote:
Originally Posted by yougotjunk
Yep!! I figured as long as were not dyno racing you'll be easy pickens..:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by beefcake
Nahh....I like my car alot! It's getting ready to get a complete make-over and should run pretty decent. We'll see though!Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus
:eek:
:popcorn:
oh yeah, i didn't know mid 10's were easy pickens,Quote:
Originally Posted by yougotjunk
i'm still looking for where you finished on last years list? oh wait, r u not on the other dozen list??? :cool1:
I was on the REAL list for a little while, but shit happens and I got booted, thanks though! I wasn't on the "other dozen" cause I had a mustang last year, dipshit. I can't believe 750rwhp and 650rwtq and you only managed a mid 10....that's pretty impressive :rolleyes:.Quote:
Originally Posted by beefcake
where did you see 750rwhp?Quote:
Originally Posted by yougotjunk
http://beef-cake.net/sigpic.jpg
i see hp, not rwhp, and i haven't been 10's yet, but i've added about 200hp since i went high 11's, so i don't think 10's should be problem
so, instead of bench racing a car thats never even hit the track, why don't u do something first
thanks for playing
Talk about "bench racing"??? Already claiming that mid 10's isn't easy pickens, but yet the car has only been high 11's?? :lol::lol: So what did you do, pull your motor out and throw all the parts on it and put it on an engine dyno to rattle off those numbers in your sig? Or did you plug some numbers into desktop dyno? Just wondering....Still though, if the car was making 550 last year and went some high 11's, that's still pretty impressive!! LMAO!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by beefcake
And besides that, you can take a bone stock LS1 camaro and put spray on it and run high 11's on regular radials. Then again, your known for taking high HP cars and running slow ET's so I guess I shouldn't have expected much.
:popcorn:
considering the car is an auto on regular radials, no stall, with a 2.56 gear to go an 11 with 27 mpg on a daily driver was pretty impressive i thoughtQuote:
Originally Posted by yougotjunk
and, the tens i'll be running will be with the same gear 2.56, so, put a 2.56 gear in your car and lets line em up
really, my shelby with only 420rwhp went 11.17 @ 4200 lbs, doesn't seem too slow to meQuote:
Originally Posted by yougotjunk
Considering the camaro I know of went 11.80's @ 121 with an auto, no stall, and a stock 2.73 gear and was getting just as much MPG as you were, i'd have to say your car was pretty slow for having that much HP and TQ.Quote:
Originally Posted by beefcake
Don't count your chickens before they hatch!! I'm sure we'll be at tri-state on the same day this year...I'll be sure to line up beside ya!Quote:
Originally Posted by beefcake
So tell me...How did you get those big HP and TQ numbers in your sig if it wasn't on a dyno? Is that what LS2 Dave told ya??
Damn I know your a cars salesman, but why you gotta lie so much??Quote:
Originally Posted by beefcake
http://www.stangbangerz.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=35771
Soo....you went an 11.17 with 520rwhp...It must have slipped your mind or that's a typo or something when you said you went that ET with 420rwhp...or you're just trying to make yourself look a little better. :rolleyes:
typo, duh, and thats still a great et for that weightQuote:
Originally Posted by yougotjunk