Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 51

Thread: NHRA Top Fuel to 1000 feet, not 1320 feet

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Alexandria
    Posts
    1,083

    NHRA Top Fuel to 1000 feet, not 1320 feet

    http://www.nhra.com/content/news/30355.htm

    This is different... it will be interesting to see though.


    Craig
    2005 Ford Mustang GT 5MT
    2009 UMTR SS #7

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Cake eater, Ky
    Posts
    7,113
    This will instantly give an extra 320 feet of slow down area. I think it is a good move.
    Keith
    If you agree, pass it on.
    If you can read this - Thank a teacher!
    If you are reading it in English -Thank a soldier!!
    Keith Decker. Carpet cleaning MoFo!!
    I got a coupe!!! Picture me doing the Happy Dance!!!

    My coupe PICS!!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Playing with transmissions
    Posts
    7,021
    Since the fuel cars pull so much timing after 3 seconds, Doubt you'll see much change in trap speeds. Pulling the timing though is getting the cylinders all mixed up and causing the explosions.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    8,677
    it'll definately be interesting though, i'll miss the 1/4 mile

    i don't know how many races are decided in the last 10 feet of that 1320

    hopefully they'll return to it with some better track ideas
    [B]2015 Mustang GT - 8.40@170
    2022 F150 10.76
    www.beefcakeracing.com for all your late model Mustang, Hemi and Camaro Exhaust / Supercharger / Suspension and suspension needs.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Springboro, OH
    Posts
    8,348
    I think it will be hard for fans to relate to since most are use to 1/8 or 1/4 mile tracks. Making it a 1000 ft race will probably be like converting people to the metric system.
    They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Ben Franklin



    1998 Mustang GT
    Coyote Swapped


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    White Oak, OH
    Posts
    3,816
    On a good run you will still see 300mph trap speeds at 1000'. NHRA's own rules to keep the speeds down to <330 have caused most of the engine problems for the fuel cars. They have max rpm limits and a rear end gear limit rule in both nitro classes. So for a TF car to go 320+ on the top end they are on the rpm limiter before the traps...this causes lot of issues in the motor...which is why you see all the problems on the top end.
    Kilkare xtreme outlawseries X235 2014 Champion and Record Holder
    Dedpedal Racing;Sponsered by Lasota Racing;Tuned by S&M motorsports motorsports
    Boss block 347/225 TFS HP's/SR/BW S476/A2W/PG/FAST xfi on E85
    5.33@134 on a 26x8.5"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    1,660
    It will make any difference in reaction times at the starting line all the more important. Good interim step, but I hope the NHRA will mandate longer shut-down areas or automatic deployment of the chutes in case of an explosion that Del Worsham put on his FC (which John Force also implemented), so 1320 racing resumes.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Hebron, KY
    Posts
    395
    I don't know how well this is going to go over with the fans. I agree that the NHRA's current limits are causing most of the engine problems, but again we run into issues with the people making the rules not really understanding how the engines work or the problems that their restrictions have caused.

    As a long time fan that grew up around fuel cars since about the time I could walk....I'm not pleased. Let's focus more on driver and vehicle safety, not an illusion of safety by making up BS rules and restrictions.
    -Nick Skaats
    Skaats Precision Motorsports
    Owner/Tuner
    2001 Firebird Formula - Sunset Orange Metallic
    377 LS, NA, 4L60E, 3,550 lbs
    10.33 @ 129 MPH 1.39 60'

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    harrison, oh
    Posts
    820
    they need to make longer shut downs at these facilities & keep it 1/4....if a track dosen't want to change or is not able to...sorry....replace the stop on the tour with a place that can & will bring in 7 digits over 4 days

    1/8 mile & 1000' drag racing is stupid....

    may as well go racing the billy dirt drags at your local fair grounds ...i think they are @ 300'....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    1,660
    Quote Originally Posted by 93cobra View Post
    they need to make longer shut downs at these facilities & keep it 1/4....if a track dosen't want to change or is not able to...sorry....replace the stop on the tour with a place that can & will bring in 7 digits over 4 days

    1/8 mile & 1000' drag racing is stupid....

    may as well go racing the billy dirt drags at your local fair grounds ...i think they are @ 300'....

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Franklin
    Posts
    802
    why take the risk i say detune the cars to not run all out and blow up like something stupid.,, I think they should keep the 1320 and just slow the cars down its that simple..
    89 purple coupe

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Franklin
    Posts
    802
    1/4 miles is drag racing not 1000ft
    89 purple coupe

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    308
    Quote Originally Posted by 92BlackStang View Post
    why take the risk i say detune the cars to not run all out and blow up like something stupid.,, I think they should keep the 1320 and just slow the cars down its that simple..
    stupid. whos going to control how much to detune them. there going to push the tuning issue no matter how much power or engine size or anything else you tell them to. thats what they get paid to do. this just gives them time to improve the safety issues they have.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    West Chester
    Posts
    1,486
    They will go back to the 1/4, and have stated that already. They are doing this to try to decrease the chances of losing another driver while they make changes to tracks, cars, whatever.

    TF dragsters are actually on the limiter a lot longer than the FCs. Engine explosions aren't nearly as dangerous with it behind the driver, but it seems like the biggest explosions have actually come from the dragsters in the last few years, ripping them right in half quite a few times. The FCs themselves usually hold together with a big explosion, it's just that little difference of having the engine blow up in your lap and you can't see a damn thing.
    2003 SVT Mustang Cobra
    11.40@124
    Pics, mods, track videos, other stuff..

    The rest of the fleet:
    2019 Edge ST
    2015 Taurus SHO
    2013 SVT F150 Raptor

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cincy
    Posts
    4,679
    Ever see some real 1/8th mile outlaw and pro mod racing. I think it takes more skill than you think. 1000ft I bet the cars will still be within .1 or .2 of what they run now
    I wish my lawn was Emo so it would cut itself...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Hebron, KY
    Posts
    395
    I think if they really did want to limit the power and speed, the safest way to do it would be by limiting the size of the engines or raising the minimum weight of the vehicles.
    -Nick Skaats
    Skaats Precision Motorsports
    Owner/Tuner
    2001 Firebird Formula - Sunset Orange Metallic
    377 LS, NA, 4L60E, 3,550 lbs
    10.33 @ 129 MPH 1.39 60'

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cincy
    Posts
    4,679
    Raising the weight on these cars is dangerous also. Higher weight =more and higher forces durring a wreck. People will go fast with anything.
    I wish my lawn was Emo so it would cut itself...

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Franklin
    Posts
    802
    Quote Originally Posted by 1byafender View Post
    stupid. whos going to control how much to detune them. there going to push the tuning issue no matter how much power or engine size or anything else you tell them to. thats what they get paid to do. this just gives them time to improve the safety issues they have.
    well stupid, for one the person tunin the cars can detune them dont ya think. why run something all out and blow up, when you can slow them down and still have good racing..
    89 purple coupe

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    middletown oh.....for now
    Posts
    41
    they detune nascars,why not top fuel cars.same idea there guy.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Playing with transmissions
    Posts
    7,021
    They have detuned the nitro cars.

    Timing retard starts at thre seconds and then a 8500 rpm revlimiter.

    4.0 @ 300 mph at the 1000, alot easier on parts since your not banging of the revlimiter for the last 200 feet

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •