Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 51 of 51

Thread: NHRA Top Fuel to 1000 feet, not 1320 feet

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Vandalia
    Posts
    1,580
    Off subject but whats this I hear about Bob Glidden being hospitalized?

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Middletown, OH
    Posts
    32
    I would think that the logical solution would be something that is engaged when a car hits a "point of no return" on the track that a normal car would not hit. Like a big air bag deploys in front of that area for the car to hit. Or put a drag hook on the car and make it catch a a cable like a plane on an aircraft carrier does to stop.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    West Chester
    Posts
    1,486
    Quote Originally Posted by Mista Bone View Post
    no shortage at all.

    Dow chemical won't sell to NHRA because NHRA doesn't have the needed safety standards.

    Vp is the only allowed nitro supplier, Don Shumacher has PLENTY of nitro but it's not from VP, therefore it's not allowed for use.
    That's not what Don Schumacher said in person on TV. He said there is a worldwide shortage of the stuff, and that he has a limited amount on hand (50 barrels IIRC) that he sells to other race teams outside of NHRA and supplies would be tight for him as well to make it through the year. The same stuff he got fined for having in his pits during a NHRA event.

    So if there's no shortage according to you, why did the NHRA ban all nitro testing for FC and TF?
    2003 SVT Mustang Cobra
    11.40@124
    Pics, mods, track videos, other stuff..

    The rest of the fleet:
    2019 Edge ST
    2015 Taurus SHO
    2013 SVT F150 Raptor

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    1,660
    Quote Originally Posted by Mista Bone View Post
    Dow chemical won't sell to NHRA because NHRA doesn't have the needed safety standards.
    I don't understand. What does Dow claim the safety issues are?

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Independence
    Posts
    1,487
    Quote Originally Posted by Katmandu View Post
    x2 Restrictor plates. Nascar drivers also have to drive for fuel efficiency as well. Need to make it to the end.

    It's going to be weird......Instead of folks asking ...."Hey, what's it do in the quarter ?" It'll be......"Hey, what's it do in the 1000 ?"

    BTW, how much fuel will be saved shaving off 320 feet ?
    Restrictor plates won't do much with a forced induction motor, they'll just up the RPM's of the blower to make up for the restriction. There's an interview with Dale Armstrong about this whole thing and his suggestion is to lower the static compression ratio and make it a rule like 6:1 or 6.5:1 instead of the 7.2:1 range they are running now. Makes more sense to me.
    Wayne Best

    86 Trans Am, LG4, A4

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Hebron, KY
    Posts
    395
    +1 for compression ratios. If they're going to limit the speed of the cars, dropping the compression would be a safe way to do it. Limit compression, boost, and cubes and you wont have any ways around the rules.

    I'm still not a big fan of limiting the cars. I think it's BS. They need to focus on making the tracks safer. Has there been any explanation for why there was a solid barrier at the end of the track instead of a sand trap, field, or another safety device for runaway cars?
    -Nick Skaats
    Skaats Precision Motorsports
    Owner/Tuner
    2001 Firebird Formula - Sunset Orange Metallic
    377 LS, NA, 4L60E, 3,550 lbs
    10.33 @ 129 MPH 1.39 60'

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Playing with transmissions
    Posts
    7,021
    Quote Originally Posted by 04 Venom View Post
    I don't understand. What does Dow claim the safety issues are?
    http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/84/i48/8448notw2.html

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    5,837
    looks like its 1000' for the rest of the year boys.

    IMO, they need to slow them down not shorten the track.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Hebron, KY
    Posts
    395
    Let them keep developing and pushing the cars, but lengthen the track.

    Watched a 1000' race last night....it's not the same even on TV.
    -Nick Skaats
    Skaats Precision Motorsports
    Owner/Tuner
    2001 Firebird Formula - Sunset Orange Metallic
    377 LS, NA, 4L60E, 3,550 lbs
    10.33 @ 129 MPH 1.39 60'

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    8,677
    Quote Originally Posted by nskaats View Post
    Let them keep developing and pushing the cars, but lengthen the track.

    Watched a 1000' race last night....it's not the same even on TV.
    yep, i don't like it at all
    [B]2015 Mustang GT - 8.40@170
    2022 F150 10.76
    www.beefcakeracing.com for all your late model Mustang, Hemi and Camaro Exhaust / Supercharger / Suspension and suspension needs.

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Playing with transmissions
    Posts
    7,021
    I don't mind the shorter races, they have been tighter.

    Just make the class run on alky if you wanna slow them down........which would be stupid.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •